![]() |
|
| Home | About Us | News | Reviews | Ancient & Modern | Events | Links | Feedback |
|
Ancient &
Modern: 28th February 2009 |
|
To general disapproval (and in direct contradiction to Chancellor Darling), Lord Mandelson has suggested that the government should not be too hasty in removing bonuses from (presumably) ‘hard-working’ bankers. How very ‘New Roman’. There were far-reaching social and cultural
changes in the Roman world from 100 BC – AD 120, during the collapse
of the republic and growth of
empire (beginning with the first Roman emperor Augustus, 27 BC-AD 14).
As a result, the old Roman nobility which had formed the republican Much had happened to bring about this change. Access to elite education (learning the skills of oratory, vital for advance in the key areas of law and politics) was now no longer the privilege of the old nobility. ‘New’ Romans were perfectly at ease with Greek culture (language, dress, etc.), which earlier generations had often seen as a threat. The architect Vitruvius showed that it was quite possible to fuse Roman architecture with Greek and Italic models. The research of scholars like Varro demonstrated that ancient beliefs about ‘the Roman way’ and ancient traditions of ritual and worship (especially of ancestors), so vital for nobles’ credibility, were often completely wrong. No wonder the republic was going to pot, concluded Cicero. Another important development in undermining
the old families’ claims
on
power was the huge expansion of wealth that accompanied Rome’s
fast-growing empire. ‘New’ Romans took full advantage of
this, to the
dismay of the old families who thought riches were their prerogative. And so to Lord Mandelson. The point is that none of the execrated bosses
of the failed banks is a toff. They come from ordinary backgrounds and
have reached the top. They represent, in other words, exactly the sort
of people that Labour is in favour of, however incompetent. Had they
|
A&M Archive |