![]() |
|
|
Home | About Us | News | Reviews | Ancient & Modern | Events | Links | Feedback |
|
Travelling
Heroes |
Archive Reviews since 2001 |
Richard Miles From the BBC History Magazine, November
2009
Peter Jones reviews TRAVELLING HEROES: GREEKS AND THEIR MYTHS IN THE EPIC AGE OF HOME By Robin Lane Fox (Allen Lane 514pp £25) For the past thirty years myth and early Greek literature, especially Homer and his near contemporary, the farmer-poet Hesiod (c. 700 BC), have been in the grip of Orientomania. Brilliant books like /The East Face of Helicon/ by Martin West (All Souls, Oxford) have demonstrated how intimately early Greek stories are entwined with Near Eastern tales such as e.g. /Gilgamesh/. For example, in both /Gilgamesh/ and Homer’s /Iliad /the main heroes Achilles and Gilgamesh are sons of goddesses, with mortal fathers; both are helped by their mothers, who use more powerful gods to support their cause; both heroes are obstinate and passionate, prone to instant decisions; both lose their dearest companions; both are devastated by their loss and take extreme action to try to compensate for it; and so on. Robin Lane Fox, University Reader in Ancient History at New College Oxford, will have none of it. For him, while there may have been some influence way back in the unrecoverable past, neither Homer nor Hesiod had direct, contemporary hot-lines to Near Eastern contacts. Their poetry, he argues, depended on Greek understanding of the world, not Near Eastern. There are two main planks to his case. First, Lane Fox shows that (as the pottery record indicates) there were Greeks (especially from Euboea) with very close links to the Near East from the period well before Homer, through extensive trading networks. Second, he demonstrates (admittedly from extensive later sources) that the Greeks were passionate syncretists, enthusiastic about finding connections between their own customs, myths and gods and those of other cultures, wherever they could. Usually these connections bore no relation to any reality, but that did not matter. Greeks then disseminated these stories of alien gods or customs or people, duly altered to fit Greek assumptions, wherever they went. So the ‘hot-line’ theory is not needed. The ‘alien’ content of the works of Homer and Hesiod is much better explained as derived from Greek travellers who had been to Phoenicia, Assyria, Cyprus, Syria and so on, not directly from Near Eastern sources. Take the cult of Adonis, the beautiful boy with whom Aphrodite herself fell in love. This can be traced back to Mesopotamian society in 2000 BC. Lane Fox argues that Euboeans would have encountered it c. 950 BC in Cyprus, where it had been brought by Phoenicians, but reckons that it became a feature of Greek culture through Greek Cypriots, who began to adapt it to fit their own assumptions and spread it across Cyprus and other Greek islands into the Greek world in general. The problems with Lane Fox’s argument are two-fold. Since evidence for early Greek connections with the Near East depends on pottery finds alone, it is impossible to document cultural interaction. Much, therefore, of Lane Fox’s evidence comes from much later sources (‘X would have been the case’ is a constant refrain). Further, we do not know how Homer learned to recite his poetry, or from whom: the evidence does not exist, because writing was not available at that time to tell us. All we know is that the language and content of oral poetry were constantly changing over the hundreds of years the poems were being handed down the generations before Homer ever lived. Under those circumstances, one is simply guessing about what or who might have influenced whom or when or how or where. The point is that Martin West’s case for Near Eastern influence is very powerful, nor does Lane Fox deny it. What he does deny is that Homer was working off /contemporary/ Near Eastern material. Given Greek fascination with other cultures, that seems to me entirely possible, perhaps probable, but impossible to demonstrate. But whatever one makes of Lane Fox’s central argument, this complex, wide-ranging, superbly referenced and good-humoured investigation tells a tale that ranges case by case over the eastern and western Mediterranean, casting imaginative light in all sorts of unlikely places on how cultures crossed the ancient world. He has re-written that story in a way that will have scholars of classical history, anthropology, myth and epic arguing for a long time to come. Travelling Heroes, By Robin Lane Fox East to west and back again: an epic of our roots In his posthumous The Greeks and their Heritages, Arnold Toynbee pronounced that "the crowning evidence that a new civilisation had come to birth is... the adoption and adaptation of the Phoenician alphabet in the eighth century BC for writing Greek". Here, Robin Lane Fox sets that mighty achievement, the implications of which are with us to this day, in its full East-West context – or contexts. Phoenicians and other oriental peoples, Euboean islanders and other Greek travellers, merchants and settlers, generations of composers and reciters of Homeric epic poetry: all are produced with a sweeping narrative flourish worthy of a cinematographer or screenwriter. But the whole is seasoned and leavened with a wit that only writing can afford. Lane Fox is "our most widely read historian of the ancient Greek world", according to the dustjacket. Certainly, he is one of our most original, daring and arguably life-enhancing. More than any other historian known to me writing today, he gives "ancient history" its most generous interpretation, emulating if not exceeding his undergraduate teacher Geoffrey de Ste Croix. His preceding book, The Classical World, was an engaging and enjoyable bite-size feast of mezze from early Greece to the reign of the philhellenic Roman emperor Hadrian (117-138). But in Pagans and Christians (1986) he took the religiously transformed story of Greek history deep into Late Antiquity. Religion – or rather his principled opposition to any fundamentalist version of it – was also the keynote of his excursion into Biblical criticism, The Unauthorized Version (1991). I give these bibliographical details partly because Travelling Heroes comes ballasted with a huge (50-page, about 1,000 items) and not always quite accurate bibliography, which follows an even huger (65 pages) section of notes. This new book cannot be recommended, as The Classical World could be, as a work for the ordinary general reader, no matter how entertainingly, often brilliantly, written it is. The non-specialist should stick firmly to the main text, which takes off from an image of the goddess Hera airborne in the 15th book of Homer's Iliad. It transports us to and fro, East-to-West and vice versa, from Mesopotamia to central Italy and on to Spain and back, and concludes with a "just-so" story of the author's own hyper-fertile invention. Which goes like this. "Hipposthenes" (Greek name, "strong in or with horses", but of mixed Euboean-Greek and non-Greek parentage) flourished in the eighth century BC and died a heroic death. Born in the northern Aegean city of Mende (famous later for its wine) in what became Macedonia, he travelled to the islands of Chios and Cyprus, and from there on to Syria, where he acquired a young slave-girl concubine, a sort of Sheheradzade figure. Thence he removed himself to more islands – Crete, Cythera, Ithaca (Lane Fox doesn't buy the new, persuasive theory relocating Homer's Ithaca further west), Corcyra (Corfu) – and through the straits of Messina to Cumae in the bay of Naples, before making his final return via Zancle in north-east Sicily to his paternal homeland of Euboea (that long island, "rich in cattle" literally, athwart Athens's eastern shoreline) to die in battle. Who says romance is dead? Among his other quirks and quiddities along the way, the author – not "Hipposthenes" – shows a strange preoccupation with mammoths. But Lane Fox can also be very down-to-earth. Underlying the myths (ancient) and romance (his), there is a very serious message about inter-ethnic cultural contact and civilisational change and development. I'd guess it's the desire to put this across that has driven him to publish in a semi-popular form what is at bottom a long-meditated scholarly monograph. Since "9/11" the "clash of civilisations" has acquired a massively renewed topical urgency, and with it has come a renewed interest both in defining what is essentially "Western" and in deciding when, how and why the "West" came into being. The Graeco-Persian Wars of the early fifth century BCE are one obvious possible big-bang flashpoint in antiquity – a view favoured by, for example, Tom Holland and Anthony Pagden in recent large-vista studies. Herodotus rightly features in both as the very incarnation of an Eastern-inspired but quintessentially Western thinker. What Lane Fox does is take that story back to the eighth century, to the Phoenicians and Euboeans, and to (among much else) the invention of the alphabet. The Greek inventors of the first fully phonetic alphabetic script, child's play to scribe, could not have done it without the Phoenicians. But their borrowing was problem-solving and creative, far from the merely derivative. That is emblematic, for Lane Fox, of Greek-Oriental cultural interaction as a whole, including the borrowing of "myth" – but not the invention of the Homeric epic.
|
More than one review here.
Scroll down the page. |